Quantum Pings Library
MIX-46: Ultra‑High‑Rigor Protocol for Orb Photography

- Type
- Study
- By
- Vadim Streltsov
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- August 2026
A rigorous scientific protocol tests the phenomenon of orb photography, aiming to determine if these light anomalies are real or just artifacts of the environment.
Protocol MIX-46 implements the unified metrological framework of Protocol 9.0 to test the claimed phenomenon of orb photography – the alleged appearance of anomalous globular light artefacts in photographs, sometimes interpreted as evidence of paranormal entities or energies. The primary observable is the frequency and characteristics of circular light anomalies (orbs) in photographs taken under controlled conditions, compared to control photographs (taken in particle‑free environments, without flash, or with known particle sources). The experimental design includes standardised photography protocols (fixed camera settings, flash usage, distance, lighting), controlled particle environments (HEPA‑filtered clean room, controlled introduction of dust/pollen, insect presence), stereo photography for 3D localisation of particles, triple blinding (photographers, judges, and analysts are blind to condition), objective image analysis (morphological feature extraction, machine‑learning classification), multiple independent blind judges to control for pareidolia, comprehensive environmental monitoring, and positive controls (known optical artefacts to validate detection sensitivity). The protocol mandates a pilot phase to calibrate equipment, validate judge agreement, and estimate baseline artefact rates. The primary analysis uses a Linear Mixed Model (LMM) with fixed effects of Condition (active shooting conditions vs. controls), with α = 0.025 (one‑tailed) and power ≥ 0.90 for a small to moderate effect (Cohen's d ≥ 0.10). The sample size is N = 200 independent photographs per condition (baseline, with adaptive increase to N = 300 if pilot shows high variability). Statistical analyses are preregistered, include Bayesian inference (BF₁₀), permutation tests, and multiverse robustness checks (≥70% of 12 forks). The aim is to detect a reproducible orb phenomenon or to establish an upper bound on the effect size with unprecedented rigor.
In plain language
The researchers set up a careful experiment to see if orbs in photographs are real or just caused by dust and other particles. They took pictures in clean rooms and used special methods to analyze the images. The goal was to find out if orbs could be reliably detected or if they were just tricks of light.
The meaning
This research provides a structured approach to validating orb photography, potentially uncovering evidence of paranormal phenomena that many have experienced but lacked scientific backing.
The skeptic
The study's complexity and controlled conditions may not fully account for all variables, and the focus on statistical significance could overlook the subjective nature of interpreting visual phenomena.
Key takeaways
- Rigorous testing protocols can help validate or debunk claims of paranormal phenomena.
- Controlled environments are essential for objective analysis of visual artifacts.
- Statistical methods ensure the reliability of findings in controversial topics.