Synchronicity Research Group, University of Essex
University of Essex
An academic group studying how and why people experience synchronicity, with an eye to historical and contemporary context.
Library › Tags › study
Quantum Pings Library
14 curated entries tagged “study” — books, studies, stories, and posts about synchronicity, each with the meaning and the skeptic’s take.
University of Essex
An academic group studying how and why people experience synchronicity, with an eye to historical and contemporary context.
PLOS ONE, 2024
Three studies found that people who report more meaningful coincidences also score higher on real life creativity.
Heliyon, 2022
A study of how seeing patterns in random noise relates to paranormal belief and to creativity.
Thomas L. Griffiths and Joshua B. Tenenbaum
A landmark paper showing that coincidence judgments fall directly out of rational Bayesian inference — the brain treats improbable matches as evidence for hidden causes.
Michiel van Elk
Shows that believers are more likely to see intention and agency in random movement — the "something is behind this" feeling that powers synchronicity.
Riekki, Lindeman, Aleneff, Halme, and Nuortimo
An experiment showing that paranormal believers see faces in random noise more often than skeptics do — direct evidence for the apophenia link.
Bernard Beitman
Beitman's clinical overview of coincidence: the brain evolved to find patterns because the world really is patterned, and coincidence sits at that intersection.
Fyfe, Williams, Mason, and Pickup
A study connecting apophenia to schizotypy and theory of mind, showing how the machinery that reads minds can also read minds into randomness.
Richard Wiseman and Caroline Watt
A review arguing that belief in psychic ability is largely driven by misattribution: ordinary experiences and coincidences read as paranormal.
Peter Brugger
Brugger's case that paranormal belief — including synchronicity — is grounded in ordinary brain mechanisms like apophenia and dopamine-driven pattern detection.
Ruma Falk and Clifford Konold
Shows that people see structure and pattern in random sequences, and that this is the perceptual root of the feeling that coincidence means something.
Persi Diaconis and Frederick Mosteller
The paper that gave coincidence a mathematical home: it catalogs the fallacies that make coincidences feel impossible and shows how to study them properly.
Thomas Gilovich, Robert Vallone, and Amos Tversky
The classic demonstration that fans and players see "hot hands" in what is statistically random — a canonical study of pattern illusion.
Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman
The foundational paper on heuristics and biases, including representativeness — the mental shortcut that makes improbable-seeming coincidences feel so meaningful.